Legal Opinion

Hydraulic Press Mfg. Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 25, 1941No. 676PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

The instant suit is brought by the plaintiff for infringement of Re-issue Patent No. 19,694 granted to the plaintiff and said to cover a “Hydraulic Motor Control Means.”

A motion is now made by the defendants purportedly to enable them to prepare responsive pleadings, all as permitted by Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro cedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

The defendants ask particulars as follows :

1. What hydraulic motor control means manufactured, used or sold by each of the defendants will be relied upon to support the infringement charged; the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jessup & Moore Paper Co. v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1938
  2. Smith v. Buckeye Incubator Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1940
  3. Midwest Mfg. Co. v. Staynew Filter Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
  4. Pirnie v. AndrewsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stefaniak v. BolandDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API