Eaker v. . International Shoe Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action for actionable negligence brought by plaintiff against the defendants.
The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto, were as follows:
"1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, the International Shoe Company, as alleged? Answer: Yes.
2. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, Robey Small, as alleged? Answer: Yes.
3. Did the plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to his injury, as alleged in the answer? Answer: No.
4. What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $18,000."
The necessary facts will…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stewart v. Carpet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Womble v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Ross v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Bowden v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Call v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Young v. Anchor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.