Legal Opinion
Pollio v. Planning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 31, 1995No. 15008PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
The dispositive issue raised by this appeal1 is whether a municipality is authorized pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 8-lc2 to establish and collect reasonable fees to cover the costs of engineering review of construction plans and inspection of subdivision improvements during construction in connection with an application for a subdivision. We conclude that § 8-lc authorizes such fees, and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
In 1989, the defendant town of Somers (town)3 enacted an ordinance pursuant to § 8-lc to establish a base application fee of $250 and additional fee…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- United Illuminating Co. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Dart & Bogue Co. v. SlosbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- M. Dematteo Construction Co. v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.