Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Babbitt
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Exxon Mobil Corporation and TOSCO Corporation appeal the district court’s judgment affirming the Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”) decision invalidating their thirty-two unpatented oil shale mining claims. The IBLA concluded that the claims were null and void because plaintiffs had failed to substantially perform the assessment work required by statute. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Exxon has twenty and TOSCO has twelve unpatented oil shale mining claims located in the Piceance Creek Basin in Garfield County, Colorado. Exxon and TOSCO acquired these…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Andrus v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KrushnicSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Independence Mining Co. v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Orion Reserves Ltd. Partnership v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- High Country Citizens Alliance v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Maralex Res., Inc. v. BarnhardtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- High Country Citizens Alliance v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006