Legal Opinion

Independence Mining Co. v. Babbitt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1997No. 95-16112PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KING, District Judge:

Independence Mining Company, Inc. (“IMC”) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion seeking a writ of mandamus or an order compelling the Secretary of the Interi- or to determine the validity of its mineral patent claims and, if appropriate, issue patents for the claims. IMC contends the district court erred in refusing to direct such actions because IMC had shown the Secretary had enacted certain changes to the procedures for processing mineral patent applications for the purpose and with the effect of unreasonably delaying that process. IMC also argues…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. In Re Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Brower v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Hollywood Mobile Estates Ltd. v. Seminole TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 516, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 829 Independence Mining Company, Inc. v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior United States Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Khan v. JohnsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API