Legal Opinion
Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie M. B. H. v. Brown
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 13, 1935No. 6294PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
Appellee,, plaintiff below, sued defendant corporation for legal services performed by paintiff and three associates in representing defendant in claims held against the United States. From a judgment for the sum of $250,000 for the services so rendered defendant prosecutes this appeal.
The court below based its judgment upon an extended and very elaborate finding of fact, and in this appeal any defense on the merits has been waived. Counsel for defendant company plant their case upon certain questions of law upon which the present appeal turns.
It appears that in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Circuit Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Bevan Ex Rel. Bevan v. FixWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Barton v. Chrysler (In Re Paine)District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
- Brown v. Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie, M. B. H.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.