Legal Opinion

Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Circuit Management Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 28, 1954No. 235, Docket 22924PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from a proceeding to disqualify Robert E. Nickerson and the law firm of Robert E. Nickerson and William Gold from acting as attorneys in a private motion picture anti-trust suit. The facts of the case are as follows : Philip Loew and Consolidated Theatres, Inc., retained the law firm of Nickerson and Gold to institute an antitrust action against a large number of motion picture producers. Messrs. Nickerson and Gold drafted a complaint alleging that the defendants had seriously damaged a theatre owned by Loew and leased and operated by Consolidated…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. People v. GeroldIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Gulf Oil Corporation, and United Nuclear CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  4. Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API