Legal Opinion

Brown v. Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie, M. B. H.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 13, 1939No. 7086PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Associate Justice.

On a former appeal 1 we decided that appellant was not entitled to recover upon the identical contract which is involved in the present appeal, and remanded the case for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion rendered therein. The lower court thereupon entered an order for costs in favor of appellee and for a new trial. The parties stipulated “that the issues of fact herein may be tried and determined by the Court without the intervention of a jury, a jury being hereby waived, and further that the evidence adduced at the former trial of the issues…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  5. Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. White v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  2. Potomac Passengers Association v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. Hartman v. LubarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. Mayflower Hotel Stockholders Protective Committee v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API