Legal Opinion

Equitable Royalty Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land Office

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 2, 1960No. 38379PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action, defendant in error, the State of Oklahoma ex rel. The Commissioners of the Land Office of said State, hereafter referred to as “Commissioners”, seeks to establish the State’s asserted fee simple title to the NE/4, Sec. 36, T. 23N, R. 19W, Woodward County, free and clear of the hereinafter referred-to adverse claims of plaintiff in error. When referred to collectively herein, plaintiffs in error will be referred to as “defendants”.

The case was submitted to the trial court upon a stipulation of facts and a supplement thereto. The pertinent facts developed by said stipulations…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Vance v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Scott v. PaisleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. State Ex Rel. VassarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Bell Silver & Copper Mining Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Porter v. BarrettMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Loffland Bros. Equipment v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Hunt v. Washington Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Sears v. FairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Chickasha Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Tulsledo Oil Co. v. State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API