Legal Opinion

Tulsledo Oil Co. v. State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land Office

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 22, 1963No. 40198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Defendant in error, the State of Oklahoma, ex rel, the Commissioners of the Land Office of said State, hereinafter referred to as Commissioners, brought the action from which this appeal arises. The State seeks to quiet its asserted fee simple title to the Sj/⅞, Sec. 13, Twp. 25 N., R. 26 W., I. B. M., Harper County, as against certain adverse claims of plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as Tulsledo. In its brief, Tulsledo states that “In view of the recent mandate in Horany v. State, Okl., 375 P.2d 963, defendant has abandoned its appeal as to the Southwest Quarter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stevens v. PattenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Reed v. Richards & Conover Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Equitable Royalty Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Nix v. BroganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Roberts v. C. F. Adams & SonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of G.D.J.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. Davis v. School Dist. No. D-14, Etc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. In Re Adoption of GdjSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API