Legal Opinion

Porter v. Barrett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1925No. Docket No. 49PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiffs as vendors entered into a contract to sell Louis Parent two lots in Muskegon Heights. By assignment defendant Wilbratt Barrett acquired the vendee’s interest; we assume defendant Auxilie Barrett to be his wife. A house was erected on the premises. By separate contract the Barretts agreed to sell the premises to defendant Wilson Robinson who is a negro. The original contract seems to have been lost and two copies, varying slightly, are in the record; Exhibit 1 contains this clause:

“This land is, sold upon express condition that the business of manufacturing or selling intoxicating…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Cowell v. Springs Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Mandlebaum v. McDonellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Queensborough Land Co. v. CazeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Apartment Ass'n of L.A. Cty. Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Oliver v. Kalamazoo Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1973
  4. Meade v. DennistoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. Sipes v. McGheeMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API