Legal Opinion
Loffland Bros. Equipment v. White
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 10, 1984No. 59581PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMA WILSON, Justice.
Claimant White filed a belated claim for workmen’s compensation benefits. Employer and its workers’ compensation insur*313er pleaded the statute of limitations.1 The trial court held the statute of limitations had been tolled by virtue of 85 O.S. 1981, § 8. An en banc panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court affirmed and Employer appealed. We now review by certiorari an opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division No. 3, construing 85 O.S. 1981, § 8 of the Workers’ Compensation Act.
Prior to the enactment of Section 8 (effective 7-1-78), an employer had no duty to inform an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Farris v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Equitable Royalty Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Oklahoma Cotton Coop Ass'n Compress v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
3Cited by42 opinions
- Forest Oil Corp. v. Corporation Com'n of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Hammock v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- American First Abstract Co. v. Western Information Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Bennett v. Scrivner, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- H.W. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.