Legal Opinion
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. Central Valley National Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 10, 1968No. Civ. 24869PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.
Following a judgment condemning a parcel of real property to San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, proceedings were had pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1246.1 to apportion the $33,000 condemnation award as between Donald Moore and Sanfar Laboratories, Inc., the owner and lessee, respectively, of the subject property. Sanfar appeals from the judgment in those proceedings, which judgment awarded $2,025 of the $33,000 to Sanfar and the remainder (less taxes due to the County of Contra Costa and the City of El Cerrito) to Central Valley National Bank, Moore’s assignee.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- City of Los Angeles v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Spindler Realty Corp. v. MonningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. KlopstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Zang v. Northwestern Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- County of Los Angeles v. KlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Soroush-Azar v. Palmer CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013