Legal Opinion
State v. Thurman
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 1999No. 25356PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.
Raymond T. Thurman conditionally pled guilty to one count of unlawful possession of a mule deer doe and one count of unlawful possession of a mule deer fawn, I.C. § 36-502, after his motion to suppress the evidence was denied by the magistrate. Thurman appealed to the district court, which affirmed the magistrate’s decision. Thurman again appeals, asserting that his right to be free from unlawful intrusions was infringed, in violation of both the United States and Idaho Constitutions, by an Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) officer who stopped him at an impromptu…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. JensenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. KimballIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
- Tanner v. Idaho Department of Fish & GameDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.