Legal Opinion

State v. Jensen

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 2003No. 28458PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from an intermediate appellate decision of the district court. The state claims error in the district court’s conclusion that Lewis Orlando Jensen could not receive separate consecutive sentences for battery and resisting and obstructing officers. Jensen claims error in the district court’s conclusion that the magistrate’s imposition of consecutive maximum punishments for three misdemeanor offenses was not excessive.

I

BACKGROUND

Jensen was charged with battery upon a police officer, I.C. §§ 18-903, -915, resisting and obstructing officers, I.C. § 18-705, and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. AdamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Knutsen v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. Allen Keith ClontzIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. WoodburyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Nez Perce County Prosecuting Attorney v. ReeseIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. McCarthyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API