Legal Opinion
Union Indemnity Co. v. State Ex Rel. Beasley
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 20, 1930No. 8 Div. 107PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The bill of exceptions does not purport to-contain all the evidence and does not so recite.
The complaint declares for labor, material, and supplies furnished an original contractor. The recent cases pertinent, and being suits against sureties and principals, are Union Indemnity Co. v. Handley (Ala. Sup.) 124 So. 876: Union Indemnity Co. v. State, for Use of R. S. Armstrong & Bro. Co., 218 Ala. 132, 118 So. 148; Pettus v. Dudley, 218 Ala. 163, 118 So. 153; Union Indemnity Co. v. State, for Use of McQueen Smith Farming Co., 217 Ala. 35, 114 So. 415; and the case for labor, material, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wadsworth v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Union Indemnity Co. v. State Ex Rel. McQueen Smith Farming Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- National Surety Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Robinson v. United States ex rel. Brown-Ketcham Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Pettus v. Dudley Bar Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Charles R. Shepherd, Inc., and United States Casualty Company v. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Sullivan, Long & Hagerty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- New York Indemnity Co. v. NivenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931