Legal Opinion

New York Indemnity Co. v. Niven

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 12, 1931No. 6 Div. 626PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit is upon a road contractor’s bond. There were several interventions: (1) By one who furnished board to an employee; (2) for oil and gasoline used in the construction of the project; (3) by those who claim for work and labor performed during that construction ; (4) for rent and repairs on a machine while so employed; (5) for repairs on a shovel; (6) for rent of a tractor; (7) for claim for chert purchased and hauled; and (8) for charges for. patchwork in connection with the construction of said project.

The effect of our statutes, under recent decisions, is declared in Union Indemnity…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Struthers Wells Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Cathcart v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  5. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of LincolnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Consolidated Indemnity & Ins. v. Southern G—F Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API