New York Indemnity Co. v. Niven
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit is upon a road contractor’s bond. There were several interventions: (1) By one who furnished board to an employee; (2) for oil and gasoline used in the construction of the project; (3) by those who claim for work and labor performed during that construction ; (4) for rent and repairs on a machine while so employed; (5) for repairs on a shovel; (6) for rent of a tractor; (7) for claim for chert purchased and hauled; and (8) for charges for. patchwork in connection with the construction of said project.
The effect of our statutes, under recent decisions, is declared in Union Indemnity…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Struthers Wells Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cathcart v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of LincolnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Consolidated Indemnity & Ins. v. Southern G—F Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933