Legal Opinion

Stott v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 27, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICK VAN PELT BRYAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, alleging that they constitute a protective committee for minority stockholders of the Nashville, Chattanooga and St. Louis Railway, sue to enjoin and set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission authorizing the merger of the Nashville, Chattanooga and St. Louis Railway with the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company. They seek the designation of a three judge court to hear and determine the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2325 and 2284, a temporary restraining order staying the merger order pending hearing by the three judge…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Schwabacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Alleghany Corp. v. Breswick & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stott v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  2. Braswell Motor Freight, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1969
  3. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1972
  4. Schroeder Nursing Care, Inc. v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
  5. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API