Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROBSON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have moved for a temporary restraining order. For the reasons set forth below, this court is of the opinion that the motion should be denied at this time.
The plaintiffs, Greyhound Lines, Inc. and The Greyhound Corporation (Greyhound), have acquired over the last several years, eight bus companies operating in the Pacific Northwest. These eight companies “virtually encircle” the route run by the intervenor Mt. Hood Stages, Inc. (Mt. Hood) from Klamath Falls to Biggs, Oregon, a distance of about 278 miles. Greyhound had an agreement with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Book Co. v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Tennessee Public Service Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1967
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1963
- Stott v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Campbell Sixty-Six Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1966
3Cited by1 opinion
- Palmigiano v. TravisonoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1970