Legal Opinion

Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 27, 1969No. 69 C 1148PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBSON, District Judge.

The plaintiffs have moved for a temporary restraining order. For the reasons set forth below, this court is of the opinion that the motion should be denied at this time.

The plaintiffs, Greyhound Lines, Inc. and The Greyhound Corporation (Greyhound), have acquired over the last several years, eight bus companies operating in the Pacific Northwest. These eight companies “virtually encircle” the route run by the intervenor Mt. Hood Stages, Inc. (Mt. Hood) from Klamath Falls to Biggs, Oregon, a distance of about 278 miles. Greyhound had an agreement with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Book Co. v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Tennessee Public Service Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1967
  3. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1963
  4. Stott v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. Campbell Sixty-Six Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Palmigiano v. TravisonoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API