Schwabacher v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
This controversy grows out of the voluntary merger of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and Pere Marquette Railway Company, which companies, together with Alleghany Corporation, sought approval by the Interstate Commerce Commission. Pere Marquette is incorporated under the laws of Michigan, while Chesapeake & Ohio is chartered by Virginia. Chesapeake & Ohio acquired and for some years exercised active control of Pere Marquette, whose properties and operations complement rather than compete with those of Chesapeake & Ohio. Late in 1945 merger proceedings were commenced under enabling statutes…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wisconsin RR Comm. v. C., B. & QRR CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dayton-Goose Creek Railway Co. v. United States, Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Callaway v. BentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gilbertville Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. ICCSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.