Legal Opinion
State v. Haar
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 26, 2009No. 24988PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] Sean Haar appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of a canine sniff of his vehicle at an interstate highway rest area. We reverse.
Facts and Procedural History
[¶ 2.] On February 26, 2008, at approximately 3:20 p.m., South Dakota Highway Patrolman Brian Swets pulled into an interstate rest area located on Interstate 90, a few miles east of Beulah, Wyoming and approximately ten miles west of Spearfish, South Dakota. Upon entering the rest area, Swets observed a Subaru Outback station wagon with Illinois license plates and a cargo box…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. OverbeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. LudemannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Sound SleeperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- In re H.L.S.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.