Legal Opinion
In re H.L.S.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 2009No. 24998PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] H.L.S. appeals the denial of her motion to suppress a urine sample obtained after she was arrested without a warrant on suspicion of possession and ingestion of marijuana. We reverse.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] On April 14, 2008, the South Dakota Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) and other law enforcement executed a valid search warrant on an apartment in Huron, South Dakota. The apartment was at that time rented to Amelia Wipf (Wipf). The search warrant permitted the premises to be searched, a search of both Wipf and Kunta Miles, and collection of urine samples from…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Jerry Wayne WoolbrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Michael John McGlynn and Kevin John SchantzenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RoachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. OverbeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Sound SleeperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BonackerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.