Legal Opinion

State v. Ludemann

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2010No. 25149PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Jacob Ludemann was arrested under the citizen’s arrest statute SDCL 23A-3-3 by student officers on the campus of South Dakota State University (SDSU) for public urination in violation of a city ordinance. He was thereafter further detained and questioned by a certified law enforcement officer with the SDSU Police Department (SDSUPD) and eventually charged with driving under the influence in violation of SDCL 32-23-1(1). Lude-mann moved to suppress all evidence obtained alleging the student officers lacked authority to arrest him under the citizen’s arrest…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. OverbeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. RaliosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. HerrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. Doap Deng ChuolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. Sound SleeperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API