Legal Opinion

State v. Mohr

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2013No. 26579PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Defendant Jeffrey Scott Mohr was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia, and obstructing a law enforcement officer, after being mistakenly identified as a suspected armed robber and detained by police. Mohr appeals, alleging officers did not have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to stop or frisk Mohr. Mohr asserts that evidence against him was obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure and that the trial court erred by denying a motion to suppress the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. KrebsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. FierroSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. HemmingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. EdwardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. WalterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API