Legal Opinion

United States v. Grace

District Court, D. Montana

Decided August 24, 2006No. CR 05-07-M-DWMPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOLLOY, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

The Defendants have filed a motion to exclude the proffered opinion testimony of Government witness Dr. Daniel Teitelbaum. Dr. Teitelbaum’s expert disclosure states that he is prepared to testify regarding a 1978 study he conducted for Defendant Grace involving analysis of chest x-rays of employees at Grace’s Libby Mine. Apart from Dr. Teitelbaum’s curriculum vitae, the disclosure consists of nothing more than an incomplete version of the report he issued to Defendant Grace on August 25, 1978. 1 The Defendants argue that the Teitelbaum’s opinion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. GraceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2005

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. WR GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Bosley v. DePuy Synthes Sales IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  3. City of Seattle v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  4. City of Seattle v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  5. City of Seattle v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API