United States v. Grace
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOLLOY, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
The Defendants have filed a motion to exclude the proffered opinion testimony of Government witness Dr. Daniel Teitelbaum. Dr. Teitelbaum’s expert disclosure states that he is prepared to testify regarding a 1978 study he conducted for Defendant Grace involving analysis of chest x-rays of employees at Grace’s Libby Mine. Apart from Dr. Teitelbaum’s curriculum vitae, the disclosure consists of nothing more than an incomplete version of the report he issued to Defendant Grace on August 25, 1978. 1 The Defendants argue that the Teitelbaum’s opinion…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. GraceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2005
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. WR GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Bosley v. DePuy Synthes Sales IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- City of Seattle v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- City of Seattle v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- City of Seattle v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.