Legal Opinion

United States v. Grace

District Court, D. Montana

Decided December 5, 2005No. CR 05-07-M-DWMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOLLOY, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction 1

A status conference was held in this matter on December 2, 2005. Among the issues discussed at the conference were the sufficiency of the prosecution’s expert disclosures, the prosecution’s compliance with the Court’s recent discovery orders, the Defendants’ collective request for an extension of the deadline for reciprocal discovery under Rule 16(b)(1), Fed. R.Crim.P., and the Defendants’ concerns over the size of the government’s witness list. Pursuant to Rule 17.1, Fed.R.Crim. P., and in order to promote the orderly progression of this matter to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Ruben Zuno-ArceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Michel-DiazDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. GraceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2006
  2. United States v. GraceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009
  3. United States v. WR GraceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API