First Security Trust Co. v. Lentz
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J.,
after stating the ease: The right of the plaintiff to bring this action and to seek the advice of the Court on an existing state of facts, upon which a decree or some direction in the nature of a decree may be founded, is supported by a number of decisions, notably Balsley v. Balsley, 116 N. C., 472, 21 S. E., 954, Tyson v. Tyson, 100 N. C., 360, 6 S. E., 707; Little v. Thorne, 93 N. C., 69, and Tayloe v. Bond, 45 N. C., 5.
It may be observed in limine that with the exception of the homestead right and the rights of a widow, which generally are superior to the rights of creditors,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- University v. . BordenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Murchison v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- State Ex Rel. Pate v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Tayloe v. . BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
- Little v. . ThorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Wallace v. . BennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Rigsbee v. . BrogdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Gurganus v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Lockridge v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.