Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of La Fleur

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*936Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 12, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that LTI, Inc. was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.

LTI, Inc. contracts with businesses to test individuals for proficiency in various languages under an exclusive license from the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (hereinafter ACTFL). The United States Postal Service retained LTI to administer ACTFL English writing tests to candidates seeking employment as postal inspectors. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Ted Is Back Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In re the Claim of StuckelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of ZelenkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of YankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of InterlandiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re the Claims of NoelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. In re the Claim of SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. In re JoonBug Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. In re LTI, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API