Legal Opinion
In re Ted Is Back Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 20, 1984PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*726OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that an employment relationship exists between Ted Is Back Corporation and its salespeople is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Although a determination that an employer-employee relationship exists may rest upon evidence that the employer exercises either control over the results produced or over the means used to achieve the results (Matter of 12 Cornelia St. [Ross], 56 NY2d 895, 897; Matter of Sullivan Co. [Miller], 289…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re 12 Cornelia Street, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Matter of Sullivan Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law, Made by Levine v. Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- In Re the Claim of LevineNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In re Samuel Green Engraving Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hart v. Rick's Cabaret International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In Re Empire State Towing & Recovery Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Bynog v. Cipriani Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- In re the Claim of RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.