Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Stuckelman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 17, 2005PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 22, 2003, which, inter alia, assessed Blodnick, Gordon, Fletcher & Sibell, P.C. for additional unemployment insurance contributions based on remuneration paid to claimant and others similarly situated.
Claimant worked as a legal secretary for the law firm of Blodnick, Gordon, Fletcher & Sibell, EC. from 1998 until 2002. Her duties entailed preparing pleadings in negligence cases for Lawrence Gordon, one of the law firm’s partners. When claimant’s employment ended, she applied for unemployment insurance benefits.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Ted Is Back Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re the Claim of WildeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of ZaweskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hernandez v. Chefs Diet Delivery, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Saleem v. Corporate Transportation Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Gagen v. Kipany Productions, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of BoothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of La FleurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.