Legal Opinion

Chamberlin v. Puckett Construction

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1996No. 95-470PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Randall R. Chamberlin, d/b/a Custom Framing (Custom Framing), appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, concluding that Custom Framing committed an anticipatory breach of the subcontractor agreement between Custom Framing and Puckett Construction and from the court’s subsequent order awarding Puckett Construction attorney's fees and costs. We affirm and remand for determination and award of Puckett Construction’s attorney’s fees and costs on appeal.

We address the following issues:

1. Did the District Court err…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Boreen v. ChristensenMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Loney v. Milodragovich, Dale & Dye, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Morning Star Enterprises, Inc. v. R. H. Grover, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Keebler v. HardingMontana Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Havre Daily News, LLC v. City of HavreMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Chase v. Bearpaw Ranch Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Eschenbacher v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Ray v. NanselMontana Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API