Legal Opinion

Eschenbacher v. Anderson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 2001No. 01-034PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Stuart Eschenbacher appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order of the Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, concluding that Eschenbacher breached a purchase contract between Eschenbacher (d/b/a Cascade Log Homes) and James C. Anderson and that the proper remedy is to rescind the contract. We affirm and remand for determination and award of Anderson’s attorney’s fees and costs on appeal.

¶2 We find the following issues are dispositive of this appeal:

¶3 Whether the District Court erred in failing to interpret the contract as requiring Anderson to provide…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Daines v. KnightMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ophus v. FritzMontana Supreme Court · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Ray v. NanselMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Kottel v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Blue Ridge Homes, Inc. v. TheinMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Emmerson v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Redies v. CosnerMontana Supreme Court · 2002

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API