Legal Opinion

Loney v. Milodragovich, Dale & Dye, P.C.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1995No. 95-195PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Cleve Loney (Loney) appeals from an order of the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We affirm.

The issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in dismissing Loney’s complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), M.R.Civ.P., on the basis that his claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

The law firm of Milodragovich, Dale and Dye, P.C. (the Firm) represented Loney in bankruptcy proceedings. In April of 1991, the Firm filed an action to recover unpaid attorney’s fees from Loney. Loney…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boreen v. ChristensenMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Brown v. EhlertMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Harlem Irrigation District v. Montana Seventeenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Salway v. ArkavaMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Taylor v. Department of Fish, Wildlife & ParksMontana Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Northfield Insurance v. Montana Ass'n of CountiesMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. SattlerMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Orozco v. DayMontana Supreme Court · 1997

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API