Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Valera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1995PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Orders of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department (Miller, J. P., McCooe and Glen, JJ.), entered October 29, 1993, unanimously affirming orders of Civil Court, New York County (Howard Malatzky, J.), respectively entered January 29 and February 16, 1993, which dismissed holdover proceedings on motions by tenants Valera and Harmon, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the tenants’ motions are denied and the respective petitions are reinstated.

Respondents are each month-to-month tenants in City-owned housing in Manhattan. In 1992, 30-day notices of termination were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MSG Pomp Corp. v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re SternbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. 512 East 11th Street HDFC v. GrimmetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McGoldrick v. DeCruzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2003
  2. Volunteers of America-Greater New York, Inc. v. AlmonteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Pinehurst Construction Corp. v. SchlesingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Bellstell 140 East 56th Street, L. L. C. v. LaytonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999
  5. D.K. Property, Inc. v. Mekong Restaurant Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API