Legal Opinion
United States v. Tom York, D/B/A York's Mobil Service, and John Hare
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 24, 1968No. 18001PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge.
The United States brought this action under the Medical Care Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2651-2653, to recover the reasonable value of medical care and treatment furnished to a person who was injured “ * * * under circumstances creating a tort liability upon [the Defendants] * * * to pay damages * * 42 U.S.C. § 2651(a). Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted by the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee on the ground that 42 U.S.C. § 2651(b) (2) barred this independent action since the Government had failed to intervene in a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Miami University Ohio State University, the Chronicle of Higher Education, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Commercial Union Insurance Company v. United States v. William ScottCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Andrew GeraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Franklin StudivantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.