Legal Opinion
United States v. Franklin Studivant
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 22, 1976No. 74--2130PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
The question presented here is whether the United States is bound by the provision of a state statute which requires that those claiming benefits under the Act shall file a notice of intent within a specified time. The district court held that the time requirement was not a statute of limitations and that the federal government must abide by the notice provision. We agree and affirm.
The appeal is from an order dismissing one of the government’s two counts in a complaint based on the Federal Medical Care Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2651-2653.1 The suit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Andrew GeraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Tom York, D/B/A York's Mobil Service, and John HareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Fort Benning Rifle and Pistol ClubCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Lacey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Kaczmarek v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Burgos v. CaninoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.