Legal Opinion
Esposito v. Specyalski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 6, 2004No. SC 17063PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
This is a joint appeal of the plaintiff and of the third party defendant from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant Mercedes-Benz Credit Corporation (Mercedes-Benz Credit) on both its counterclaim and its third party complaint. Because we determine that the decision of the trial court is not yet ripe for adjudication, we dismiss the appeal.
The record discloses the following undisputed facts. The plaintiff, Raymond Esposito (Esposito), the executor of the estate of Neil Esposito (decedent), commenced this action for damages1 against the defendants, Heather…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- National Treasury Employees Union v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Ray Donald LoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Coalition for the Abolition of Marijuana Prohibition v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- United Transportation Union v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hopkins v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Chadha v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- New England Pipe Corp. v. Northeast Corridor FoundationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- BROWN AND BROWN, INC. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.