Legal Opinion
Arbutina v. Bahuleyan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 12, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant doctors appeal from Special Term’s order estopping them from interposing the Statute of Limitations as a defense to plaintiff’s claim for the wrongful death of her husband on November 28,1975. We previously reversed orders granting defendants leave to amend their answers affirmatively to plead the Statute of Limitations and remitted the matter to Special Term for a factual determination of whether they are equitably estopped from pleading this defense (Arbutina v…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ford v. Unity HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Meese v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Wen Kroy Realty Co. v. Public National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Procco v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Arbutina v. BahuleyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McIvor v. Di BenedettoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Finnegan v. NFT-Metro Bus System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Hill v. Millard Fillmore HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989