Strother v. Strother

BROCK, Chief Judge.

On appeal the wife raises two assignments of error.

The first assignment of error arises out of the following finding of fact in the 29 May 1975 order:

“ . . . There has been a substantial change concerning plaintiff’s income in the form of an addition which will more than make up for her increased needs; ...”

The wife argues that this finding is not based on competent evidence. In particular she questions whether it was proper for the judge to use the 10 April 1975 letter describing the payments due from the York note as evidence on which to base the finding of fact described…