Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Cannon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1972No. 7218DC400PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEOCK, Judge.

The defendant through his counsel of record has moved that his brief be amended in the following respects:

“On page 2 of the brief, following the word Argument in the center of the page, the following words should be inserted:

(Defendant’s Exception No. 2, Epp. 17-18, 26, and Assignment of Error # 2, Ep. 27).”

We have allowed this motion.

Also the plaintiff through her counsel of record has moved that the case be dismissed. This motion is denied.

The assignment of error brought forward on this appeal by defendant challenges the court’s determination in paragraph number 4 of the order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. SaylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Peoples v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Angell v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Peeler v. PeelerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Sprinkle v. SprinkleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Newsome v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Strother v. StrotherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API