Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dobson v. Deason

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 4, 1952No. 6 Div. 384PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWYN, Justice.

There being no assignment of error, an order of affirmance is due to be entered; and it is so ordered. Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix, Rule 1, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639; Halle v. Brooks, 209 Ala. 486, 96 So. 341; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and FOSTER and SIMPSON, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Halle v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Wetzel v. HobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Nichols v. HardegreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Belcher v. City Commission of City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Crim v. GilbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Ex parte RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Patterson v. GainsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API