Legal Opinion

Crim v. Gilbert

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 24, 1958No. 7 Div. 388PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

There being no assignment of error “bound with the transcript,” an order of affirmance is due to be entered; and it is so ordered. Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix, Rule 1, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639; Halle v. Brooks, 209 Ala. 486, 96 So. 341; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598; Dobson v. Deason, 258 Ala. 219, 61 So.2d 764; 2 Ala.Dig., Appeal and Error, ^753(2).

Affirmed.

LAWSON, SIMPSON, and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Halle v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Wetzel v. HobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Nichols v. HardegreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Dobson v. DeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erwin v. ErwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Starnes v. BrassellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Thompson v. City of FlorenceAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961