Crim v. Gilbert
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
There being no assignment of error “bound with the transcript,” an order of affirmance is due to be entered; and it is so ordered. Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix, Rule 1, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639; Halle v. Brooks, 209 Ala. 486, 96 So. 341; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598; Dobson v. Deason, 258 Ala. 219, 61 So.2d 764; 2 Ala.Dig., Appeal and Error, ^753(2).
Affirmed.
LAWSON, SIMPSON, and MERRILL, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Halle v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Wetzel v. HobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Nichols v. HardegreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Dobson v. DeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
3Cited by3 opinions
- Erwin v. ErwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Starnes v. BrassellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Thompson v. City of FlorenceAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961