Hitchens v. Hitchens
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
EICHER, Chief Justice.
This motion to dismiss complaint poses the question whether a Maryland marriage, contracted by a male between eighteen and twenty-one years of age and a female between sixteen and eighteen years of age, without consent of parents, the domicile of both parties before and after the marriage being in the District of Columbia, is annullable by this Court.
In the first place, does this Court have jurisdiction in the sense of having the power to annul a Maryland contract? Jurisdiction of the' parties, of course, is clear.
Since the decree of annulment goes back to the question…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cunningham v. . CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Harrison v. State ex rel. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
- Maier Hanson v. HansonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Reifschneider v. ReifschneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Snyder v. BuckDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1948
- Picarella v. PicarellaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Foster v. NordmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- In re Estate of Dee HansonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1962
- Nunley v. NunleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.