Legal Opinion
Zadravecz v. Zadravecz
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 29, 1995No. 13259PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court, Thim, J., determining that, pursuant to a stipulated judgment, all periodic payments of workers’ compensation benefits to the defendant, including specific award payments, are income for the purpose of determining child support. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The marriage between the parties was dissolved by judgment of the Superior Court dated May 6, 1987. Included in the dissolution decree were orders that the defendant pay to the plaintiff the sum of $100 per week *29as support for each of the parties’ two minor children…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Downs v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Connecticut Savings Bank v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Bower v. D'OnfroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Wallenta v. MoscowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Breiter v. BreiterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.