Legal Opinion

Nelson v. City of San Francisco

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 28, 2005No. 03-16643PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff Paul 0. Nelson appeals from the district court’s order granting the City and County of San Francisco’s (“City”) motion for summary judgment on his claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17. The district court held that statistical evidence proffered by Mr. Nelson was not properly before the court because he had failed to disclose the name of his expert or submit his expert report as required by Rule 26(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Mark A. Aragon v. Republic Silver State Disposal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Domingo ex rel. Domingo v. T.K.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Anthony Quevedo v. Trans-Pacific Shipping, Inc. Bhp-International Marine TransportCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
  2. Perez v. HunterDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API