Legal Opinion
Domingo ex rel. Domingo v. T.K.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 3, 2002No. Nos. 00-15064, 00-15137PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion of this court filed in this case on January 3, 2002, slip op. at 39 [276 F.3d 1083], is amended as follows:
At slip op. at 50 [276 F.3d at 1089], second full paragraph, the final clause of the first sentence (“indeed, no such theory had ever been published”) is modified to state: “indeed, no theory linking extensive malleting to FES had ever been published.”
At slip op. at 53 [276 F.3d at 1090], first full paragraph, the final two sentences and following citation (beginning with “It is generally not sufficient ...” and continu*603ing through the end of the paragraph) are deleted.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Balint v. Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Charlotte KENNEDY and Robert Kennedy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COLLAGEN CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Haim Shalit v. Cheryl Coppe, A/K/A Cheryl Gardner ShalitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Andrew H.K. Wong v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Clausen v. M/V New CarissaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Robert Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Edwin Hardeman v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Hendrix v. Evenflo Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2009
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.