Legal Opinion
Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided June 4, 2012No. 3:11-cv-819-J-32JRKPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, District Judge.
During the trial of this patent case, plaintiffs expert, Dr. Thomas Beebe, testified for the first time on cross-examination that he had followed an undocumented protocol for his Shore D testing that is entirely inconsistent with the procedures disclosed in his expert report. This caused defendant Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (“JJVC”) to make an ore terms motion to exclude Dr. Beebe’s testimony regarding his Shore D testing and for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(a). The parties submitted briefing on this issue (Does. 265, 266, 274),…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Reese v. HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Louise Cook v. Sheriff of Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Hanson v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2018
- Dunlap v. Clear Blue Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- ESW Holdings, Inc. v. Roku, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.