Legal Opinion

Hardesty v. Naharkey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1923No. 13931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Redmond S. Cole, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBranson, J.

This appeal is prosecuted by the plaintiffs in error, W. B. Hardesty, O. K. Eysenbach, and Bessie C. Eysenbach, against Sammie Naharkey and others, defendants in error, to reverse an order, judgment, and decree of the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., rendered in favor of the defendants in error, as plaintiffs, against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants in said court.

It is now before this court upon motion filed by the defendants in error to dismiss this appeal, on the ground that the appeal was prematurely brought. They say there was no final judgment or order entered by the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Foreman v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Perrin v. LepperMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Gray v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Smith v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Billy v. Le Flore County Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. In Re Halle's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Elliott v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Rowan v. RowanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. RitterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API