Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Glancy v. Parole Board of the Michigan Department of Corrections

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 27, 1968No. 5667PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FOX, District Judge.

This is a Civil Rights action based on § 1983, 42 U.S.C. Plaintiff is an inmate at the Southern Michigan State Prison in Jackson, Michigan. Respondent is the Parole Board of the Michigan Department of Corrections. Jurisdiction is based on § 1343, Title 28 U.S.C.

Plaintiff alleges the unconstitutionality of the Michigan Parole Statutes, M.S. A. 28.2303-05, C.L.1948, §§ 791.233-791.-235. He claims these statutes deny him due process and equal protection guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. He seeks a temporary injunction…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. Department of Public HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bricker v. Michigan Parole BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
  3. Harkless v. Sweeny Independent Sch. Dist. of Sweeny, Tex.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
  4. Allah v. Commissioner of Dept. of Correctional ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1978
  5. Sams v. New York State Board of ParoleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API