Legal Opinion

Bricker v. Michigan Parole Board

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 18, 1975No. Civ. A. 5-72237PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOINER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Samuel Bricker has filed this action for injunctive relief and damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1988 against the Michigan Board of Parole, the individual board members, and one parole officer. He claims: (1) that a parole restriction, i. e., that he not work for Central Sanitation Services (CSS) in any capacity, inhibits his right to seek gainful employment, subjects him to financial hardship, and restricts his fundamental rights of liberty; (2) that the Board wrongfully revoked his parole on September 4, 1975, in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cleavinger v. SaxnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. John Houston Sellars v. Raymond K. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Daniel Johnson v. Joe Kegans and John HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. Phillips v. Warden, State Prison of Southern MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Jerry Farrish v. Mississippi State Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API